Hi,
Player download:
Not sure what version of kernel but 4.4.3 sounds about right.
Oh wait..I did make a note along those lines.
Highest kernel I was able to get to work with workstation 12.5.2 was kernel 4.8.17
Not sure if that also runs with Player 12.5.9, but I would try to use the latest 12.x version of workstation if at all possible.
--
Wil
Hi,
Something like the following should work:
var doc = new XML(xmlresponse);
var soapenv = new Namespace("http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/");
var ns1 = new Namespace("urn:DefaultNamespace");
var data = doc.soapenv::Body.ns1::GETLISTETRIGRAMMESResponse.GETLISTETRIGRAMMESReturn.LISTE.item;
var array = [];
for each (var x in data) { array.push(x);
}
System.log(array);I am looking for a way to create a screenshot of a running VM. I know of the createScreenshot_Task but I am not sure how to use it. Is there any information on how to create a workflow to do this?
Thanks
Can you confirm that VLAN 51 exists on the physical switch ("show vlan")?
André
You have two active vmnics on ESXi host and only one port on the physical switch is configured as a trunk.
Can you leave only one vmnic on ESXi host connected to trunk port as active. Or configure both ports as trunk interfaces with necessary VLANs.
Hello,
Reading https://www.virten.net/2016/11/usb-devices-as-vmfs-datastore-in-vsphere-esxi-6-5/ mentons about "Create VMFS5/6 Datastore on USB drives" with a starting sector of 2048. Would it be pssible to create a new partition from the sector after where ESXi 6.7 is installed to use up the remaining space?
Thanks
I have the same question.
How can I use vRA to build Azure machines with managed disks
I can confirm that VLAN51 does not show up in the physical switch.
As I understand it (could be wrong), I can explicitly assign a particular VLAN to a physical switch port; but my end goal is to be able to run multiple VLANs off of one or two physical switch ports. Ports Gi0/2 and Gi0/21 are both set as trunk ports; I assume that's why they're not listed here.
In the release notes of Workstation Pro 12.5.3, it is indicated that the with Linux host with kernel 4.9.0 of failing to start is resolved. Chances the case would be the same with Player 12.5.3.
You can also look at this GitHub link for higher versions of Linux kernels.
So I agree that is what profiles are for but I need to be able to build out the first host in our cluster and use it as my host to update my profile. We use a decent amout of post settings in our environment and would like to script the build and move on from there.
Thank you,
Yes, I can set them both as Trunk. I did that originally just for testing so that if I broke one of the NICs somehow the other would pick up the slack. But I have no assigned both Gi0/21 and Gi0/23 (physical ports on the Cisco managed switch that run to vmnic1 and vmnic3 in vSphere) as Trunk.
VLANs won't appear magically. You have to configure them manually on a physical switch and then configure ports with necessary VLANs.
Trunk ports can serve more than one VLAN, but you have to add necessary VLANs into trunk.
Hi,
Create a workflow, add an input parameter to it, give it some name (for example vm) and set its type to VC:VirtualMachine. Then add a scriptable task item, bind the vm input parameter as in parameter, and add the following scripting code:
// start the task
var task = vm.createScreenshot_Task();
// wait for task to complete
var result = System.getModule("com.vmware.library.vc.basic").vim3WaitTaskEnd(task, true, 1);Muito bom saber.
Por favor, considere marcar esta resposta como "correta".
Thanks. I will try that.
Ok I see that all VLAN are allowed by default if you configure port as a trunk interface from Catalyst 3560 Software Configuration Guide, Release 12.2(52)SE - Configuring VLANs [Cisco Catalyst 3560 Series Switches]…
But this also means that VLAN51 can work only on your ESXi host and frames won't go anywhere outside ESXi host.
The ping tests the same subnet or on different subnet and behind a firewall?
AV on server?
I have attempted to add the VLAN manually into the switch with no favorable result, however based upon your recommendation I will try again. I had thought that with the Sophos firewall configured for VLAN51 and with the vSphere portgroup configured for VLAN51 that the Cisco managed switch would just serve as an intermediary and allow communication between the two devices.
This leads me to something that has confused me: you can see from the PNG that VLAN2, VLAN3, VLAN4, VLAN5, VLAN50, VLAN 52, AND VLAN 53 are all present. However I have configured no VLANs for those numbers. I did configure VLAN 50 at the firewall and statically assigned my ESXi host and vCenter Server static IPs in the .50.* subnet, but never did I do any configuring in the firewall for VLAN 50 other than to explicitly assign Gi0/17 and Gi0/19 those VLANs. I suppose perhaps the original owner of the switch may've had those configured; that's the only thing I can imagine would cause those VLANs to appear.
So to follow your instructions, I will create VLAN51 in the Cisco switch. That's easy enough. But to your knowledge, will I need to do anything to add it to my trunk ports? As I understood it, trunk ports carry all VLANs by default unless specific VLANs are defined. Thank you for your help thus far.
Nevermind! I don't know what I did before, but adding the VLAN to the Cisco switch did the trick. Thank you so much! I feel that a great burden has been lifted off my shoulders. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Hello. I've got a POC (Proof of Concept) environment built with only one of each server (SQL, Connection, App Volumes, Composer) . So no load balancing. I've got to restart all the servers to apply Windows updates.
I logged into the View Administrator and all the test users are showing a "Disconnected" status. No one is active. I checked with some and they are running a lengthy report that could take days to finish so they just disconnected.
My question, since all the users are not actively using a Horizon Client or Web Browser on their virtual desktops and their desktops are in essence locked can I restart the servers without affecting the virtual desktop status? I would think it would not affect any unless they are actively online.
Thanks!